Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Foreign Vehicles Entry Permit (VEP) Charge Entering Johor Bahru外国车辆入境费



Joint Media Statement by Andrew Chen Kah Eng, Liow Cai Tung, Cheo Yee How and Wong Shu Qi on 7th July 2014 (Monday):



If the BN-led federal government insists implementing the border charge imposed on foreign vehicles entering Johor Bahru, the money gained should be spent on improving local public transport and enhancing local economy.



This is not the first time that the issue of foreign vehicle entry charge is being raised. We do think however, that it’s timely for us to review the plan of our city transportation, and the direction of our development in a comprehensive manner, regardless of whether or not we are going to impose the charge.



We do regret that the Land Transport Authority of Singapore had decided earlier to increase the VEP from S$20 to S$35, which would adversely affect Malaysian citizens who travel frequently between the two cities.



Yet, we understand that both Singapore and Johor Bahru are facing traffic congestion problem with the increasing number of private vehicles, therefore certain policies must be implemented to curb the deteriorating traffic condition.



To reduce private vehicles on the road by imposing a charge is not a new policy and has been proven effective globally with other policies implemented at the same time.



Therefore, we do agree with the new border charge on foreign vehicles if a comprehensive plan to improve our public transport is implemented simultaneously. Otherwise, it will only prove that the border charge is merely a new income scheme for the federal government with no view of giving benefit for the local people.



Moreover, the new entry charge on foreign vehicles proposed by the Malaysian government must not just be a retaliation towards Singapore’s recent decision.  



The border charge collected by our customs officers from foreign registered vehicles must be used towards improving the greater Johor Bahru public transport service. We must acknowledge the fact that Malaysians are forced to own private vehicles since there is no “last mile” connection in our public transport system.



On the other hand, even after imposing the charges on both sides, no one can guarantee there is no congestion at the customs checkpoint anymore. There is a need to cut waiting time on both sides and it should be a policy priority for both governments, especially on the Singapore's side. 



People who are driving, paying mortgage loan and wasting their time on being stuck in the congestion could have better quality of living by having more disposable income from not using private vehicles if the public transport system is designed as an alternative and is implemented perfectly.



Therefore, we urge the Johore State Government to fight for more allocation especially if the federal government is going to impose the border charge on foreign vehicles, to improve our local public transport system, reduce private vehicles on the road and improve our local economy through strengthening public transportation.



We understand the concerns of those in the retail trade and tourism as well as frequent commuters between both sides as the new policies by both governments would affect business adversely or increase financial burden on those affected. This is why it must not be an isolated policy without holistic thinking about public transport. 



The purpose to have the entry charge of foreign vehicles is to reduce congestion; hence the revenue from the border charge imposed on foreign vehicles entering Johor Bahru should be spent on improving local public transport and enhancing local economy if the BN-led federal government insists on implementing the entry charge. Otherwise, it defeats the purpose of having the border charge.



Wong Shu Qi, Senai State Assemblyperson

Andrew Chen Kah Eng, Stulang State Assemblyperson

Liow Cai Tung, Johor Jaya State Assemblyperson

Cheo Yee How, Pengkalan Rinting State Assemblyperson




民主行党州议员曾笳恩、廖彩彤、邹裕豪、黄书琪201477日(星期一)发表文告:



如果国阵联邦政府真的持落外国车辆入境从新山关卡收取的入境用在改善本地公共交通系、加本地经济体系只用途上



并非是外国车辆入境费课题第一次被挑起,而一次,不后有没有落入境征收,都应该盘检讨们这座城市的交通与展方向。



于新加坡路交通管理局早前决定高外国车辆入境至新35元一事,我感到相当憾,因此一整,重影响常往返两个城市之间的马来西亚公民。



们当然了解,无是新加坡是新山,都因私人交通工具日加,因此面对严重的塞车问题,因此,有必要实施特定政策以免交通情况进一步恶化。



向私人交通工具收并不是什么新的交通政策,全球各个国家也已经证明,只要是配合其他政策一起落,私人交通工具收是一效控制交通流量的政策。



因此,只要政府同全面提升大新山区公共交通服,我们认车辆征收用以减少入境外国车辆;否,入境只是邦政府的又一新收入,根本没有惠及柔佛人民。



更重要的是,新的外国车辆入境费不能只是对新加坡政府近日调高收费决定的报复式行为。



在我国关卡向外国车辆收取的入境用在提升大新山区公共交通用途上,我来西人是因我国公共交通系,没有“最后一哩”的接,而被迫拥车。



另一方方面,就算新双都落了入境,却没有人可以保关卡不再塞。两国政府都有任想法减少关卡入境等候时间,这应该是两国政府优先考虑的政策方向,尤其是新加坡政府。



如果可以不用私人交通工具,且有一套可以完全替代私人交通工具的公共交通系统让市民使用多被迫开、供、塞的人,上就多出多可花收入,理有更好的生活品



因此,若邦政府决定落外国车辆入境,我呼吁柔佛州政府该争取更多拨款,用在改善我们的公共交通系统上,减少路上的私人交通工具,透过加强公共交通服务改善本地经济情况。



了解零售、旅游业乃至于通勤一族将会受两国双边政府的新政策严重影响,他们的生意或财政负担将会大大增加,因此,当我们谈入境费的时候,绝对不能只谈收费,却没有对提升公共交通提出任何全面的想法。



外国车辆收取入境的本意是减少塞车,因此,如果国阵联邦政府真的持落外国车辆入境,从新山关卡收取的入境用在改善本地公共交通系、加本地经济体系只用途上。








Clear reasons for imposing levies needed
Before the implementation of the proposal, the Johor state government must be clear and make known to the public on the why the state intends to impose this levy and the group of people the state government is targeting at. If we do not know why we are imposing the levy, we will neither know how to collect the levy nor spend the money collected. The state government should also have a forecast on how many vehicles will be affected so that the state government can estimate the additional revenue the federal and state government will have after imposing the levy.

Release details of the proposal
The Johor state government should also release details of the proposal so that the state government can engage Johoreans for feedbacks before the implementation. This proposal to impose levies on Singapore registered cars involves the foreign affairs between Malaysia and Singapore and must be handled properly. If mishandled, it has the potential to become an international laughing stock and thus damaging our national image.

The details that should be released include the operating hours for levy collection, the amount of the levy, the targeted group of people and the system that will be used for the collection.

The state government should also ensure that the levies are only collected from its target group of people. For example, if it is not the intention of the state government to collect levies from Malaysians, the state government should introduce a system that do not requires Malaysians, who are permanent residents of Singapore and therefore drive a Singapore registered car, to pay the levy.
Suggestions on how to use the levies collected for state developments

1. Free bus service — Provide free bus service between CIQ and Kranji MRT station to encourage commuters to use public transport. This will improve the traffic conditions along the causeway and will be beneficial for the image and development of the Iskandar region. Even though the general impression is that those Malaysians who work in Singapore earns much more due to the exchange rates, there are still many of them who are just earning enough to support their families. This free bus service will reduce the burden for this group of Malaysians.

2. Improve the efficiency of the Custom and Immigration Quarantine Complex (CIQ) — Employ enough immigration officers so that there will be more counters opened to clear the commuters. The current Malaysia Automated Clearance System (MACS) should also be fully utilised. With improved efficiency of the CIQ, there will be less congestion at the CIQ. Traffic conditions along the causeway and waiting time at the arrival hall for passengers commuting by public transport will improve.

3. Acquisition of Eastern Dispersal Link (EDL) — To date, the federal government has yet to announce any plans to acquire the EDL. Taxpayers’ money should not be used to compensate the Malaysian Resources Corp Bhd (MRCB), which is as high as RM11 million monthly. Other than promising that no tolls will be collected, the federal government can provide more assurance by using the additional income to buy over the EDL.


列明主要目地
政府在施此法之前,需要有清晰的全盘计划。清楚列明征收入境用的主要目地、主要的征收象、征收所得的用途等等。针对目地,详细的探相关政策之细节。除此之外,政府也应预计将有多少或被征收用,估征收总额,政府因此增加了多少收入。透明化理所有的问题
公布相关细节
接下来,政府也应公布所有相关细节,让人民参与讨论,以避免造成不必要的混乱或严重的交通阻塞。征收入境费用涉及两国之间的外交,若是无法完善的处理,将沦为国际笑柄,也有碍于达成2020年宏愿。

政府应公布的详情报包括收费时段、征收数额、征收对象、征收费用所使用的系统等等。

应确保向对的人征收对的钱,例如:在新加坡工作、驾驶新加坡车辆并拥有新加坡永久居留权的马来西亚公民将不受影响

政府若是向新加坡车辆征收的入境费用,建议可用作以下用途:
1. 免费穿梭巴士 — 提供免费的巴士川行于新山关卡于新加坡克兰芝地铁站之间。此举能鼓励民众使用公共交通,进而舒缓交通阻塞的问题,同时带动依斯干达经济特区的发展。 来回新马两地工作的人士也能因此而受惠。普遍印象认为在新加坡工作的人士能赚取高额的薪酬,然而在他们的辛勤背后,有时仅能赚取足以维生的薪酬而已,免费穿梭巴士有助于减轻他们的生活负担。

2. 提高通关效率 — 聘请充足的关卡移民局官员以开设更多的通关柜台。应善加利用并推广现有的通关系统,例如:马来西亚自动通关系统 (Malaysia Automated Clearance System, MACS),以加速通关手续。

3. 收购东疏大道 (EDL) — 政府至今尚未公布收购东疏大道的相关细节。政府应确保不在东疏大道设立收费站。政府也不应用纳税人的钱赔偿马资源 (MRCB)应该尽速收购东疏大道。

Wednesday, July 9, 2014

ARULMIGU SRI RAJAKALIAMMAN GLASS TEMPLE, JOHOR BAHRU

ARULMIGU SRI RAJAKALIAMMAN GLASS TEMPLE, Johor Bahru merupakan Kuil Kaca yang pertama di Malaysia dan Dunia. Kuil tersebut juga diiktiraf di dalam The Malaysia Book Of Record. Kuil ini ditubuhkan pada tahun 1922 dan mempunyai nilai sejarah yang tinggi dan unik. Kuil ini juga mempunyai daya tarikan pelancong yang tinggi di Johor Bahru.

Kami berharap usaha yang lebih konkrik daripada kerajaan untuk menolong kuil tersebut agar dapat dipromosikan kepada para pelancaong baik dari tempatan mahupun antarabangsa.




















Surat kepada :
YB DATUK TEE SIEW KIONG

YB DATUK TEE SIEW KIONG

Pengerusi Jawatankuasa Pelancongan, Perdagangan Dan Kepenggunaan

Aras 3, Bangunan Dato’ Jaafar Muhammad 79555 Kota Iskandar, Nusajaya





TUAN/YB DATUK,



Perkara :         ARULMIGU SRI RAJAKALIAMMAN GLASS TEMPLE

                        No. 22 Lorong 1, Jalan Tebrau 80100 Johor Bahru



Merujuk kepada perkara di atas, Kuil tersebut merupakan Kuil Kaca yang pertama di Malaysia dan Dunia. Kuil tersebut juga diiktiraf di dalam The Malaysia Book Of Record.



Kuil Kaca yang terletak di Johor Bahru ini mempunyai daya tarikan pelancongan yang tinggi dan usaha untuk mempromosikan tempat tersebut patut dipertingkatkan. Justeru itu, adakah kerajaan boleh :

1.      Mempertingkatkan promosi Kuil Kaca dan pengenalan kuil dimuatkan dalam buku panduan pelancongan rasmi Johor Bahru yang dikeluarkan oleh pihak kerajaan?

2.      Mendidrikan panda tanda berwarna coklat yang menunjukkan Kuil Kaca sebagai tempat pelancongan rasmi di jalan masuk ke Kuil Kaca tersebut?

3.      Menaik taraf jalan masuk ke kuil tersebut supaya para pelancong dapat pergi ke tempat tersbut dengan senang?

Mudah-mudahan dengan usaha dan kerjasama pihak kerajaan, Kuil Kaca tersebut akan menjadi tempat unik di Johor Bahru dan seterusnya mempergiatkan industri pelancongan Johor Bahru.

Kami Mengharapkan balasan positif secepat mungkin daripada pihak kerajaan Johor.

Sekian, terima kasih.



Yang benar,
YB CHEN KAH ENG
ADUN STULANG